![]() |
| President Higgins at NUI Galway |
Parents of children with special needs
face an incredible uphill struggle in Ireland. The principle of early
intervention is a sound one. It has two main benefits. When children are
treated at an early stage of development, many potential difficulties can be
bypassed. For example, speech therapy is more effective, the earlier it starts.
Secondly, costly institutional care can be avoided if a child with special
needs gains crucial self-reliance skills at an early age.
Unfortunately early intervention is far
from a reality in Ireland and it is really only available to people who happen to
have a bit of spare cash. The state system of diagnosis is horrifically slow,
with waiting lists at every turn. So the only easy way to get an early
diagnosis is by getting it privately. Even with a diagnosis, services are very
hard to get.
The argument for early intervention holds
little sway with the department of finance because long-term savings are never
valued to the same extent as short-term ones.
Parents of special needs children need
far more care and attention than other parents. What they actually get is the
opposite. They face a constant battle for rights that don’t really exist, an
endless entanglement in red tape and constant pressure to fundraise for
services which should be provided by the state but are actually provided by
charities.
Over the years many parents have gone
to court in order to get the required services for their children. The reality
is that the state does not provide adequate services for special needs children
and their families. Rather than proactively helping parents along their
difficult paths, endless blockages are put in their way. People who get carers
allowance are constantly being asked to justify themselves and fill in forms. Surely
this could be done through the schools and other institutions involved rather
than the constant harassment of parents.
The Education for Persons with Special Educational Needs (EPSEN) Act
2004, states that “a child with
special educational needs shall be educated in an inclusive environment with
children who do not have such needs”. It also talks about “inclusion” rather
than “exclusion” and contains many other progressive measures. However, most of
the provisions outlined in the Act have not been implemented. Recent budgetary
cutbacks have certainly not improved things but are perhaps used as an excuse.
The reluctance to fully implement the EPSEN Act is myopic. The long term social and financial benefits of early
intervention are clear. We need a way to ensure that long term benefits can
over-ride short-term financial considerations. It really shouldn’t be that
difficult to achieve.

No comments:
Post a Comment